Sueing for the truth about Global Warming
Only in America…
This article came across our desk. Apparently the US Chamber of Commerce feels that if the AGW movement (as they call the people who strong advocates of Anthropegenic Global Warming) wish to use billion of dollars of taxpayers money to ’save the world’ then lets establish if there really is a threat. More details below:
It comes as no surprise that this request is being firmly resisted by the many groups that make their daily bread by reaching into the pockets of taxpayers for their share of the tens of billions in government grants doled out in the insane effort to save the world from a non-existent global warming threat.
Dr. Brian Valentine of the U.S. Department of Energy wrote a letter, posted on the ClimateWatch website, that challenges the intellectually indefensible resistance of the AGW crowd to ascertaining the truth in a public forum. And I quote…
[Guest Essay by Chemical Scientist Dr. Brian G. Valentine of the U.S. Department of Energy and professor at University of Maryland, who has studied computational fluid dynamics and modeling of complex systems. Dr. Valentine is featured on page 188 of the 2009 U.S. Senate Report of More Than 700 Dissenting Scientists on Global Warming. Below is a August 25, 2009, note Dr. Valentine sent to Brenda Ekwurzel of the environmental group Union of Concerned Scientists.]
Dear Dr Ekwurzel,
According to the American Bar Association, the purpose of any “trial by legal authority” is to “establish the truth.”
I note with interest your skepticism over US Chamber of Commerce’s petition of the EPA to carry out a “trial” to examine the facts behind EPA’s interest in regulation of greenhouse gases as “a danger to the public.”
What, if anything, do you and your organization have to fear about Chamber of Commerce’s proposed trial idea?
Do you fear exposure of the idea of “man-made” global warming for the abject fraud that the idea is?
You know yourself – exactly none of the predictions related to AGW made over the past 20 years by AGW advocates have actualized. You also know there is exactly zero evidence to support any claims that “humans” have influenced the natural global climate in the least – and that means, since the dawn of Human Civilization.
If the US Public were to be made aware of these facts – at the testimony of a trial involving the EPA – then only those with religious convictions of the idea would continue to hold any support for AGW. That is in fact a very small number of people.
Falsehood cannot be sustained indefinitely – and the EPA might as well get it over with and let the facts come to light before all eyes.
I’d be interested in your response to me.
As well as quite surprised. In general, people seem to find themselves “too good” to bother to respond to me when I call AGW the fraud that it is.
Brian G Valentine PhD PE
US Department of Energy
Washington, DCRelated Link:
